Resource Center – Tools & Resources
About
Checklist provides a step-by-step visual for navigating and completing each of the sections and their corresponding steps throughout the evaluation guide
Citation(s):
Created by Safe States Alliance (2017). Evaluation Guide for Pedestrian Safety: Summary of Evaluation Step
Citation(s):
Created by Safe States Alliance (2017). Evaluation Guide for Pedestrian Safety: Summary of Evaluation Step
Table shows example evaluation roles for pedestrian safety professionals and relevant partners
Citation(s):
Adapted from: U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2014 Pedestrian Safety Enforcement Operations: A How-To Guide Boston Department of Transportation. 2001 Access Boston 2000-2010 Pedestrian Safety Guidelines for Residential Streets: Safety Guidelines for Residential Streets. World Health Organization 2010 Pedestrian safety A road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners.
Citation(s):
Adapted from: U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2014 Pedestrian Safety Enforcement Operations: A How-To Guide Boston Department of Transportation. 2001 Access Boston 2000-2010 Pedestrian Safety Guidelines for Residential Streets: Safety Guidelines for Residential Streets. World Health Organization 2010 Pedestrian safety A road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners.
Table shows characteristics of each approach and highlights noteworthy difference
Citation(s):
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide.Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
Citation(s):
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide.Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
Presents a framework for organizing pedestrian safety intervention strategies across seven domains: Collaboration, Advocacy, Encouragement, Education, Land Use & Planning, Engineering, and Enforcement.
Citation(s):
Safe States Alliance, The Evaluation Group, Transtria (2017). Pedestrian Safety Intervention Strategies and Doma
Citation(s):
Safe States Alliance, The Evaluation Group, Transtria (2017). Pedestrian Safety Intervention Strategies and Doma
Congress HR 22 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act’ or the “FAST Act” (See page 29.)
Citation(s):
National Highway and Transportation Administration’s (NHTSA) Section 405 National Priority Safety Program Fixing America’s Surface (FAST) Act Authorization of the Transportation Program Safety Grant (January 2015).
Citation(s):
National Highway and Transportation Administration’s (NHTSA) Section 405 National Priority Safety Program Fixing America’s Surface (FAST) Act Authorization of the Transportation Program Safety Grant (January 2015).
A reference to assist traffic safety and other professionals in selecting effective, evidence-based countermeasures for traffic safety problem areas.
Citation(s):
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2016, January). Countermeasures That Work, Eighth Edition. (Traffic Tech Technology Transfer Series. Report No. DOT HS 812 239). Washington.
Citation(s):
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2016, January). Countermeasures That Work, Eighth Edition. (Traffic Tech Technology Transfer Series. Report No. DOT HS 812 239). Washington.
Website provides helpful resources to support the implementation of the Safety Performance Management Final Rule that establishes the process for State DOTs and MPOs to establish and report their safety targets, and the process that FHWA will use to assess whether State DOTs have met or made significant progress toward meeting their safety targets.
Citation(s):
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Highway Safety Improvement Program – Safety Performance Management Website.
Report presents an overview and framework for state and local agencies to develop and implement a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan tailored to their specific problems and needs
Citation(s):
Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Safety. How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan. FHWA-SA-05-12. Revised March 2009
Citation(s):
Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Safety. How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan. FHWA-SA-05-12. Revised March 2009
Report documents a comprehensive analysis of pedestrian crash data trends and factors, a detailed review of more than 200 publications on pedestrian safety, and input from more than 25 expert stakeholder members
Citation(s):
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Pedestrian Safety Strategic Plan: Recommendations for Research and Product Development. October 2010. FHWA-SA-10-035
Citation(s):
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Pedestrian Safety Strategic Plan: Recommendations for Research and Product Development. October 2010. FHWA-SA-10-035
Section - 1
Provides guidance on developing a governance structure and process for partnerships
Citation(s): Z. Simon, S. Radovich. Governing Collaborative Governance: Enhancing development outcomes by improving partnership governance and accountability. Accountability and the Corporate Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper No. 23. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Citation(s): Z. Simon, S. Radovich. Governing Collaborative Governance: Enhancing development outcomes by improving partnership governance and accountability. Accountability and the Corporate Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper No. 23. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Provides background on equity, inequity, and disparity
Citation(s): CSDH (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, World Health Organization.
Citation(s): CSDH (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, World Health Organization.
Provides background on equity, inequity, and disparity
Citation(s): Unnatural Causes. Changing the way America thinks about health. (Dec 2009). PBS documentary series. a production of California Newsreel with Vital Pictures, Inc. Presented for public television by the National Minority Consortia. Impact campaign in association with the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Health Policy Institute.
Citation(s): Unnatural Causes. Changing the way America thinks about health. (Dec 2009). PBS documentary series. a production of California Newsreel with Vital Pictures, Inc. Presented for public television by the National Minority Consortia. Impact campaign in association with the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Health Policy Institute.
Provides background on equity, inequity, and disparity
Citation(s):
National Association of County and City Health Officials.
Citation(s):
National Association of County and City Health Officials.
Provides background on equity, inequity, and disparity
Citation(s):
Beyond Health Care: New Directions to a Healthier America. (April 2009) The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America.
Citation(s):
Beyond Health Care: New Directions to a Healthier America. (April 2009) The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America.
Provides guidelines for developing a budget
Citation(s):
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Citation(s):
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Presents a framework for organizing pedestrian safety intervention strategies across seven domains: Collaboration, Advocacy, Encouragement, Education, Land Use & Planning, Engineering, and Enforcement.
Citation(s):
Safe States Alliance, The Evaluation Group, Transtria (2017). Pedestrian Safety Intervention Strategies and Domains.
Citation(s):
Safe States Alliance, The Evaluation Group, Transtria (2017). Pedestrian Safety Intervention Strategies and Domains.
Section - 2
Presents an overview and framework for state and local agencies to implement a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan
Citation(s):
Zegger, C. V., Sandt, L., & Scully, M. (2006, February). How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan [PDF]. Chapel Hill
Citation(s):
Zegger, C. V., Sandt, L., & Scully, M. (2006, February). How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan [PDF]. Chapel Hill
A reference guide for an integrated and comprehensive effort to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety
Citation(s):
Brookshire, K., Sandt, L., Sundstrom, C., Thomas, L., & Blomberg, R. (2016, April). Advancing pedestrian and bicyclist safety: A primer for highway safety professionals (Report No. DOT HS 812 258). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Citation(s):
Brookshire, K., Sandt, L., Sundstrom, C., Thomas, L., & Blomberg, R. (2016, April). Advancing pedestrian and bicyclist safety: A primer for highway safety professionals (Report No. DOT HS 812 258). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
A technical assistance guide for roadway reconfiguration
Citation(s):
Road Diet Information Guide. (2014, November 24). Retrieved May 20, 2017
Citation(s):
Road Diet Information Guide. (2014, November 24). Retrieved May 20, 2017
An article that reviews street polices and discusses how to make the transportation system more accessible for all travelers
Citation(s):
Street Design: Part 1-Complete Streets. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017
Citation(s):
Street Design: Part 1-Complete Streets. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017
An online guide to support planning, designing, and operating of roadways efforts
Citation(s):
Complete Streets. (2015, August 24). Retrieved May 20, 2017.
Citation(s):
Complete Streets. (2015, August 24). Retrieved May 20, 2017.
The National Complete Streets Coalition’s list of complete street polices
Citation(s):
Complete Streets Policies. (2015, August 24). Retrieved May 20, 2017.
Citation(s):
Complete Streets Policies. (2015, August 24). Retrieved May 20, 2017.
A section of a larger online tool aimed to support public health professional conduct needs assessment and design health interventions
Citation(s):
Section 2. Understanding Risk and Protective Factors: Their Use in Selecting Potential Targets and Promising Strategies for Intervention. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017
Citation(s):
Section 2. Understanding Risk and Protective Factors: Their Use in Selecting Potential Targets and Promising Strategies for Intervention. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017
Presents an overview and framework for state and local agencies to implement a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan
Citation(s):
Zegger, C. V., Sandt, L., & Scully, M. (2006, February). How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan [PDF]. Chapel Hill
Citation(s):
Zegger, C. V., Sandt, L., & Scully, M. (2006, February). How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan [PDF]. Chapel Hill
A digital PDF that is a self-guide tutorial of how develop a program evaluation
Citation(s):
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
Citation(s):
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011.
A “do-it-yourself guide” to the concepts and use of a logic model that describes the steps necessary for you to create logic models for your own interventions.
Citation(s):
Innovation Network. Retrieved July 11, 2017 from: http://www.gnof.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/eval-logic_workbook.pdf
Citation(s):
Innovation Network. Retrieved July 11, 2017 from: http://www.gnof.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/eval-logic_workbook.pdf
Section - 3
This table shows descriptions, examples, and graphic depictions of each evaluation design along with causality and strength of attribution
Citation(s):
Adapted from: Measurement, Learning & Evaluation (MLE) Project (evaluation component of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative).
Citation(s):
Adapted from: Measurement, Learning & Evaluation (MLE) Project (evaluation component of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative).
This table shows strengths and weaknesses of each design, along with a description and example pedestrian safety intervention evaluations for each design
Citation(s):
Adapted from: University of Albany Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. Assessing Responses to Problems: An Introductory Guide for Police Problem-Solver. Appendix D: Summary of Evaluation Designs’ Strengths and Weaknesses.
Lyons, R. A., D., Kendrick, E. M. L.,Towner, C., Coupland, M., Hayes, M, et al. The Advocacy for Pedestrian Safety Study: Cluster Randomised Trial Evaluating a Political Advocacy Approach to Reduce Pedestrian Injuries in Deprived Communities. 2013. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60158.
Zegeer, C., D Henderson, R Blomberg, L Marchetti, S Masten, Y Fan, L Sandt, A Brown, J Stutts, and L Thomas. Evaluation of the Miami-Dade Pedestrian Safety Demonstration Project. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Washington, DC, 2008.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning and Research. C. Strong, M. Kumar. Western Transportation Institute College of Engineering Montana State University. Safety Evaluation of Yield-to-Pedestrian Channelizing Devices: Final Report. 2006
O’Connor, E., J. Bellamy, B. Spring. Evidence-Based Behavioral Practice Online Training Course. Critical Appraisal: Time Series Designs.
Huitema, RV Houten, H Manal. Time-series intervention analysis of pedestrian countdown timer effects. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2014. 72:23–31.
Compiled from Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment 2005. Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in United States Communities: Quantifying Use, Surveying Users, and Documenting Facility Extent.
Citation(s):
Adapted from: University of Albany Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. Assessing Responses to Problems: An Introductory Guide for Police Problem-Solver. Appendix D: Summary of Evaluation Designs’ Strengths and Weaknesses.
Lyons, R. A., D., Kendrick, E. M. L.,Towner, C., Coupland, M., Hayes, M, et al. The Advocacy for Pedestrian Safety Study: Cluster Randomised Trial Evaluating a Political Advocacy Approach to Reduce Pedestrian Injuries in Deprived Communities. 2013. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60158.
Zegeer, C., D Henderson, R Blomberg, L Marchetti, S Masten, Y Fan, L Sandt, A Brown, J Stutts, and L Thomas. Evaluation of the Miami-Dade Pedestrian Safety Demonstration Project. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Washington, DC, 2008.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning and Research. C. Strong, M. Kumar. Western Transportation Institute College of Engineering Montana State University. Safety Evaluation of Yield-to-Pedestrian Channelizing Devices: Final Report. 2006
O’Connor, E., J. Bellamy, B. Spring. Evidence-Based Behavioral Practice Online Training Course. Critical Appraisal: Time Series Designs.
Huitema, RV Houten, H Manal. Time-series intervention analysis of pedestrian countdown timer effects. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2014. 72:23–31.
Compiled from Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment 2005. Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in United States Communities: Quantifying Use, Surveying Users, and Documenting Facility Extent.
This table shows descriptions of sampling methods along with strengths, weaknesses, and examples
Citation(s):
Cluster Random Samples: Definition, Selection & Examples
J. Dudovskiy 2011 Research-Methodology Website.
Citation(s):
Cluster Random Samples: Definition, Selection & Examples
J. Dudovskiy 2011 Research-Methodology Website.
A tool to compute statistical power analyses for many different t tests, F tests, χ2 tests, z tests and some exact tests. G*Power can also be used to compute effect sizes and to display graphically the results of power analyses.
Citation(s):
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Citation(s):
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Free and open source online calculators
Citation(s):
Power and Sample Size . Com. 2013-2017 HyLown Consulting LLC. Atlanta, GA
Citation(s):
Power and Sample Size . Com. 2013-2017 HyLown Consulting LLC. Atlanta, GA
An interactive computer program for performing statistical power and sample size calculations
Citation(s):
William D. Dupont and Walton D. Plummer, Jr. (2014) PS: Power and Sample Size Calculation version 3.1.2.
Citation(s):
William D. Dupont and Walton D. Plummer, Jr. (2014) PS: Power and Sample Size Calculation version 3.1.2.
A tool that provides convenient excel-based functions to determine minimum detectable effect size and minimum required sample size for various experimental and quasi-experimental designs
Citation(s):
Nianbo Dong, Benjamin M Kelcey, Jessaca Spybrook, Rebecca Maynard. Designing and analyzing multilevel experiments and quasi-experiments for causal evaluation. Funded by: National Science Foundation [DGE-1437679, DGE-1437692, DGE-1437745], and Institute of Education Sciences [R305B090015].
Citation(s):
Nianbo Dong, Benjamin M Kelcey, Jessaca Spybrook, Rebecca Maynard. Designing and analyzing multilevel experiments and quasi-experiments for causal evaluation. Funded by: National Science Foundation [DGE-1437679, DGE-1437692, DGE-1437745], and Institute of Education Sciences [R305B090015].
R package version of PowerUp! and additionally includes functions to determine sample size for various multilevel randomized experiments with or without budgetary constraints
Citation(s):
Bulus, M., & Dong, N. (2017). PowerUpR: Power Analysis Tools for Multilevel Randomized Experiments. R package version 0.1.3.
Citation(s):
Bulus, M., & Dong, N. (2017). PowerUpR: Power Analysis Tools for Multilevel Randomized Experiments. R package version 0.1.3.
A package of tools with functions for basic power calculations using effect sizes and notations from Cohen (1988).
Citation(s):
Stephane Champely, Claus Ekstrom, Peter Dalgaard, Jeffrey Gill, Stephan Weibelzahl, Aditya Anandkumar, Clay Ford, Robert Volcic, Helios De Rosario. (2017). pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis 1.2-1.
Citation(s):
Stephane Champely, Claus Ekstrom, Peter Dalgaard, Jeffrey Gill, Stephan Weibelzahl, Aditya Anandkumar, Clay Ford, Robert Volcic, Helios De Rosario. (2017). pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis 1.2-1.
Software is intended to be useful in planning statistical studies.
Citation(s):
Lenth, R. V. (2006-9). Java Applets for Power and Sample Size [Computer software].
Citation(s):
Lenth, R. V. (2006-9). Java Applets for Power and Sample Size [Computer software].
An application to assist in the design of clinical trials by calculating the sample size using inputs provided by the user
Citation(s):
SampSize. epiGenesys. Developed in cooperation with Steven A Julious, Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield.
Citation(s):
SampSize. epiGenesys. Developed in cooperation with Steven A Julious, Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield.
A free collection of tools for conducting statistical power analysis online
Citation(s):
Zhiyong Johnny Zhang, Ke-Hai Yuan et al. WebPower: Statistical power analysis online. Supported by a grant from the Department of Education (R305D140037).
Citation(s):
Zhiyong Johnny Zhang, Ke-Hai Yuan et al. WebPower: Statistical power analysis online. Supported by a grant from the Department of Education (R305D140037).
Section - 4
A PowerPoint presentation that discusses the components of conducting a mixed methods study
Citation(s):
Creswell, John W., “Steps in Conducting a Scholarly Mixed Methods Study” ( 13). DBER Speaker Series. Paper 48.
Citation(s):
Creswell, John W., “Steps in Conducting a Scholarly Mixed Methods Study” ( 13). DBER Speaker Series. Paper 48.
A PowerPoint presentation that discusses the components of conducting a mixed methods study
Citation(s):
Tucker-Brown, A. ( 12, July 10). CDC Coffee Break: Using Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation.
Citation(s):
Tucker-Brown, A. ( 12, July 10). CDC Coffee Break: Using Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation.
Issue brief that discusses how to analyze quantitative data for an evaluation
Citation(s):
Analyzing Quantitative Data for Evaluations. (2009, July).
Citation(s):
Analyzing Quantitative Data for Evaluations. (2009, July).
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Book on mixed methods research
Citation(s): Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
Citation(s): Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
Visit your local library to find this book
Qualitative Research Methods
Book on qualitative research methods
Citation(s):
Hennink, M. M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. 2011). Qualitative research methods. London: SAGE.
Citation(s):
Hennink, M. M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. 2011). Qualitative research methods. London: SAGE.
Visit your local library to find this book
A PowerPoint presentation on mixed method evaluations
Citation(s):
Chapel, T. (n.d.). Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation.
Citation(s):
Chapel, T. (n.d.). Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation.
A website discusses the components of mixed methods
Citation(s):
Ltd, W. O. (n.d.). FoodRisc Resource Centre. Retrieved May 20, 2017.
Citation(s):
Ltd, W. O. (n.d.). FoodRisc Resource Centre. Retrieved May 20, 2017.
An online module that provides an overview of mixed method research
Citation(s):
(n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from mixed methods overview.
Citation(s):
(n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from mixed methods overview.
Provide detailed guidance on how to conduct a pedestrian and bicycle count
Citation(s):
National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project.
National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project.
Provides information on how to collect data for pedestrian safety programs
Citation(s):
Schneider, R., Patton, R., Toole, J., & Reborn, C. (2005, January). Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in United States Communities: Quantifying Use, Surveying Users, Documenting Facility Extent. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill
Citation(s):
Schneider, R., Patton, R., Toole, J., & Reborn, C. (2005, January). Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in United States Communities: Quantifying Use, Surveying Users, Documenting Facility Extent. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill
A tip sheet that guides users through the process of developing survey questions
Citation(s):
Program Evaluation Tip Sheet: Constructing Survey Questions. (2011, October).
Citation(s):
Program Evaluation Tip Sheet: Constructing Survey Questions. (2011, October).
A journal article that reviews potential sampling methodologies for pedestrian and bicycle surveys
Citation(s):
Forsyth, Ann, Asha Weinstein Agrawal, and Kevin J. Krizek. (2012). Simple, Inexpensive Approach to Sampling for Pedestrian and Bicycle Surveys. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2299: 22–30.
Citation(s):
Forsyth, Ann, Asha Weinstein Agrawal, and Kevin J. Krizek. (2012). Simple, Inexpensive Approach to Sampling for Pedestrian and Bicycle Surveys. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2299: 22–30.
A comprehensive online report that provides information on pedestrian safety surveillance
Citation(s):
Injury Surveillance Workgroup 8 (ISW8). Consensus Recommendations for Pedestrian Injury Surveillance. Atlanta (GA): Safe States Alliance, 2017.
Citation(s):
Injury Surveillance Workgroup 8 (ISW8). Consensus Recommendations for Pedestrian Injury Surveillance. Atlanta (GA): Safe States Alliance, 2017.
Provides information on how to conduct an In-depth Interview or a Focus Group Discussion
Citation(s):
Steps for Conducting Focus Groups or Individual In-depth Interviews. (n.d.).
Citation(s):
Steps for Conducting Focus Groups or Individual In-depth Interviews. (n.d.).
A step-by-step guide on how to write a case study
Citation(s):
(n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from Guidelines for writing case studies.
Citation(s):
(n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from Guidelines for writing case studies.
An online tool that provides guidance on how to analyze a case study
Citation(s):
(n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from Analyze a case study.
Citation(s):
(n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from Analyze a case study.
Provides information on the guidelines for informed consent
Citation(s):
Informed Consent FAQs. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from Infromed consent.
Citation(s):
Informed Consent FAQs. (n.d.). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from Infromed consent.
Provides greater detail on specific quantitative data collection methods that can be used to inform pedestrian safety interventions
Citation(s):
Bryan S., Yeager D., and Barnwell L. Pedestrian Safety Evaluation: Quantitative Data Collection Methods. Atlanta (GA): Research and Evaluation Group, 2017.
Citation(s):
Bryan S., Yeager D., and Barnwell L. Pedestrian Safety Evaluation: Quantitative Data Collection Methods. Atlanta (GA): Research and Evaluation Group, 2017.
Provides greater detail on specific qualitative data collection methods that can be used to inform pedestrian safety interventions
Citation(s):
Bryan S., Yeager D., and Barnwell L. Pedestrian Safety Evaluation: Quantitative Data Collection Methods. Atlanta (GA): Research and Evaluation Group, 2017.
Citation(s):
Bryan S., Yeager D., and Barnwell L. Pedestrian Safety Evaluation: Quantitative Data Collection Methods. Atlanta (GA): Research and Evaluation Group, 2017.
Section - 5
Provides general guidance on indicators
Citation(s):
Pencheon, D. The Good Indicators Guide: Understanding how to use and choose indicators. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Association of Public Health Observatories. Retrieved May 1, 2017.
Citation(s):
Pencheon, D. The Good Indicators Guide: Understanding how to use and choose indicators. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Association of Public Health Observatories. Retrieved May 1, 2017.
Section - 6
A comprehensive checklist of what should be included in an evaluation report
Citation(s):
Miron, G. (2004, September). Evaluation Report Checklist.
Citation(s):
Miron, G. (2004, September). Evaluation Report Checklist.
Provides detailed information on how to construct a data matrix
Citation(s):
Wingate, L. (2015, June). Data Collection Planning.
Citation(s):
Wingate, L. (2015, June). Data Collection Planning.